首页> 外文OA文献 >Quantum mechanics as classical statistical mechanics with an ontic extension and an epistemic restriction
【2h】

Quantum mechanics as classical statistical mechanics with an ontic extension and an epistemic restriction

机译:量子力学作为经典统计力学与ontic   延伸和认知限制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Where does quantum mechanics part ways with classical mechanics? How doesquantum randomness differ fundamentally from classical randomness? We cannotfully explain how the theories differ until we can derive them within a singleaxiomatic framework, allowing an unambiguous account of how one theory is thelimit of the other. Here we derive nonrelativistic quantum mechanics andclassical statistical mechanics within a common framework. The common axiomsinclude conservation of average energy and conservation of probability current.But two axioms distinguish quantum mechanics from classical statisticalmechanics: an "ontic extension" defines a nonseparable (global) random variablethat generates physical correlations, and an "epistemic restriction" constrainsallowed phase space distributions. The ontic extension and epistemicrestriction, with strength on the order of Planck's constant, imply quantumentanglement and uncertainty relations. This framework suggests that the wavefunction is epistemic, yet it does not provide an ontic dynamics for individualsystems.
机译:量子力学与经典力学在哪里分开?量子随机性与经典随机性有何根本区别?我们无法完全解释这些理论之间的差异,直到我们能够在一个单一的公理框架内将其推论出来,从而可以明确地说明一种理论是另一种理论的局限性。在这里,我们在一个通用框架内得出非相对论量子力学和经典统计力学。常见的公理包括平均能量守恒和概率电流守恒。但是,两个公理将量子力学与经典统计力学区分开来:“本体扩展”定义了一个不可分离的(全局)随机变量,该随机变量产生了物理相关性,而“原理约束”则约束了相空间分布。 。本体的扩展和认识论的约束,以普朗克常数的量级,意味着量子纠缠和不确定性关系。该框架表明,波函数是认知的,但它并未为单个系统提供本体动力学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号